| Dr Arun Jitendra | |||
| mailed-by |  gmail.com |
In first place why do we have to look at international financing models, it would rather be good if we are able to think something out of the box and yet rational which suits our present needs. Considering the fact even the pattern of health education is based on international curriculum its high time we start looking inside our system rather than imposing something which has been tried somewhere else . Even NRHM can be considered such an initiative which i dont think has been borrowed from anywhere.
| Dr Khyati Tiwari | |||
| mailed-by | gmail.com |
What i think is, considering international models is not a bad option, all we need to take care of is that it is appropriately defined according to the needs and circumstances. The most important aspect being sustainability. For example, micro financing is something which was implemented in extremely backward African countries and was thoroughly successful. You always have a turn to experiment something new, all u need is the guts to justify it, according to circumstances and surroundings.. bits and pieces must fall in place and then the wheel rolls on...
| Astha Gupta | |||
| mailed-by | gmail.com |
In my view, in the current global scenario of interlinked economies and globalization having entirely indigenous health financing models is not possible. To add on there are constraints from donor agencies which influence the health financing model being implemented. On the contrary a blind imitation of the international models without assessing the needs and situation of our set up is also not a feasible option. Instead we need a balanced approach wherein the international models are taken up but remodeled as per our needs after a through needs assessment and then implemented with the scope of revaluation being in place.
